The FDA will re-evaluate its regulations concerning nutritional content claims, including the use of the term “healthy.”
Over the past several years, Washington attorney Creighton “Chip” Magid has established a reputation for taking the FDA to task over some questionable policies.
A partner at the international law firm Dorsey & Whitney and head of its Washington D.C. office, Magid works with clients to reduce their liability risks and help them navigate the federal regulatory system, particularly in connection with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
In a recent reversal by the FDA, a warning label requirement for products with more than 1 gram of saturated fat was removed when KIND, the company that produces food bars whose nut content yielded higher fat ratios, fought back.
In a May 2016 article in Lifeextension.com, Magid said that KIND was simply, “pointing out the absurdity of the FDA’s position, and pointing out the evolution of nutrition science over the past two decades.” As to that high-fat content, the company noted, the same could be attributed to avocados and salmon.
According to Magid, a bigger picture is now in play as the KIND case has forced the FDA to review its standards for deeming food products as “healthy.”
Examining products’ nutritional contents individually, rather than as part of a sub-category like “fats” is the practical next step, he notes, and he points to some disturbing evidence that “fat-as-unhealthy” was a precept put forth by the sugar industry lobby.
The FDA now says it will, in fact, be re-evaluating its regulations concerning nutritional content claims, including the use of the term “healthy” based on evolving nutrition research that continues to show that certain fats like extra virgin olive oil are not only nutritious but hold astounding health benefits.
“The FDA’s move will likely lead to a pause in the extensive litigation against the food industry regarding allegedly deceptive ‘healthy’ labeling, as the courts wait for FDA to take a position,” Magid adds.
More articles on: olive oil labeling, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Nov. 14, 2022
French Scientists and Health Professionals Reiterate Support for Nutri-Score
A Change.org petition for mandatory European adoption of Nutri-Score has received more than 35,000 signatures. It comes shortly after an open letter failed to yield results.
Nov. 3, 2022
The ambiguity in the term “olive oil” has long confused consumers and enriched disingenuous actors.
Sep. 30, 2022
Businesses and Consumers Need Uniform Food Labels, E.U. Commissioner Says
Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Stella Kyriakides told European agricultural ministers that a pan-European food label would be published soon.
Feb. 6, 2023
Nutri-Score Founder: Olive Oil Will Never Attain the Highest Rating
The co-inventor of the nutrition label said olive oil would never be rated with a "Green A" because it is solely comprised of fat.
Dec. 9, 2022
Europe Puts Off Decision on Food Labeling
An Italian European Parliament member said the decision has been removed from the 2023 legislative agenda and is unlikely to be taken up again before 2024.
May. 9, 2022
Italian Police Seize €170,000 of Mislabeled Olive Oil
Italian authorities said they prevented 2.3 million liters of virgin and refined olive oils labeled as extra virgin from entering the market.
May. 9, 2022
European Commissioner to Hear Olive Oil Sector’s Concerns About Nutri-Score
European officials will work with the sector to promote extra virgin olive oil culture and health benefits ahead of the potential introduction of Nutr-Score.
Aug. 10, 2022
Nutri-Score Algorithm Update Improves Olive Oil Scores
With the update, Nutri-Score will differentiate between the type of fat content and consider micronutrients. Both factors will result in a higher score for olive oil.