`Olive Council Welcomes U.S. Report, But Queries Objectivity in Parts - Olive Oil Times

Olive Council Welcomes U.S. Report, But Queries Objectivity in Parts

Sep. 23, 2013
Julie Butler

Recent News


The International Olive Council has praised the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) for the effort behind its report on com­pe­ti­tion in the global olive oil trade but laments that opin­ions as opposed to facts” are at times con­veyed in it.

At times, the opin­ions and infor­ma­tion reported may not be suf­fi­ciently objec­tive, cor­rob­o­rated or con­sis­tent- International Olive Council.

In its first pub­lic com­ment on the USITC doc­u­ment since its September 12 release, the IOC said the com­mis­sion had gone to great lengths to inves­ti­gate the intri­ca­cies of the olive oil mar­ket” and it greatly applauds this endeavor and acknowl­edges the dif­fi­culty of such a task.”

But the Executive Secretariat of the Madrid-based inter­gov­ern­men­tal body went on to say that enquiries had been con­ducted in many coun­tries and orga­ni­za­tions which often have dis­sim­i­lar and diverg­ing inter­ests.”


At times, the opin­ions and infor­ma­tion reported may not be suf­fi­ciently objec­tive, cor­rob­o­rated or con­sis­tent, but in no way does this detract from the efforts of the USITC; sim­ply, on such occa­sions, opin­ions as opposed to facts are con­veyed,” the IOC said.

In its state­ment, titled Recently released USITC report high­lights cen­tral role of IOC in olive oil world,” the IOC also said it appre­ci­ated the acknowl­edg­ment of its role as a world olive oil forum and its posi­tion as an author­ity in areas such as olive prod­ucts stan­dard­iza­tion,” and noted the USITC report referred to the IOC more than 300 times.

Concerns about cur­rent IOC stan­dards

Among the main find­ings in the USITC report were that cur­rent inter­na­tional stan­dards allow a wide range of olive oils to be mar­keted as extra vir­gin, that the stan­dards are widely unen­forced, and that this leads to adul­ter­ated and mis­la­beled prod­ucts that weaken the com­pet­i­tive­ness of U.S.-produced olive oil in the U.S. mar­ket.

Titled Olive Oil: Conditions of Competition between U.S. and Major Foreign Supplier Industries,” the 282-page report said a grow­ing seg­ment of the global olive oil indus­try had expressed con­cerns about cur­rent IOC stan­dards for olive oil, par­tic­u­larly those for extra vir­gin.

Many indus­try offi­cials claim that by set­ting stan­dards for extra vir­gin that are eas­ily met, the IOC is favor­ing the inter­ests of its Mediterranean mem­bers that are the pri­mary sup­pli­ers of lower-qual­ity extra vir­gin olive oil in the global mar­ket instead of the inter­ests of con­sumers,” the report found.

Among other issues raised were that chem­i­cal tests in the IOC qual­ity stan­dards are not defin­i­tive in deter­min­ing the age of an olive oil, which can be an indi­ca­tor of fresh­ness. Olive oil pro­duc­ers in the United States and Australia report frus­tra­tion over the IOC’s reluc­tance to con­sider what they view as the most advanced chem­i­cal tests avail­able for this pur­pose,” the report said.

Despite its 17-coun­try mem­ber­ship, the IOC agenda is largely set by EU coun­tries with large pro­duc­tion and exports, par­tic­u­larly Spain and Italy,” it also said.

Reportedly, large multi­na­tional olive oil blenders/bottlers in those coun­tries have been par­tic­u­larly active in influ­enc­ing the activ­i­ties of the orga­ni­za­tion through their offi­cial EU rep­re­sen­ta­tives.”

Why the U.S. won’t join the IOC

The IOC ended its state­ment with an invi­ta­tion for all pro­ducer coun­tries — and all the con­sumer coun­tries in the not too dis­tant future” – to join the IOC.

Cooperation among all coun­tries, and the align­ment and ful­fill­ment of stan­dards, is of key impor­tance in the drive to enhance the qual­ity and authen­tic­ity of the olive oils sold across the globe and to facil­i­tate trad­ing by pre­clud­ing unfair com­pe­ti­tion,” it said.

But the USITC report said the U.S. gov­ern­ment did not wish to become a mem­ber of the IOC, for pol­icy and finan­cial rea­sons.” It said this infor­ma­tion came from U.S. Department of State and U.S. Department of Agriculture offi­cials.

One issue is the stan­dards devel­oped by the IOC for grad­ing olive oil. The United States views these stan­dards as not rep­re­sen­ta­tive of all global olive oil pro­duc­tion due to the IOC’s weighted vot­ing struc­ture, which, accord­ing to U.S. gov­ern­ment offi­cials, keeps the IOC from cur­rently being rec­og­nized as a stan­dards-set­ting body by the World Trade Organization (WTO),” USITC reported.

The U.S. stance on IOC mem­ber­ship is also related to broader U.S. gov­ern­ment pol­icy on U.S. mem­ber­ship in inter­na­tional com­mod­ity orga­ni­za­tions.”

According to U.S. gov­ern­ment offi­cials, the U.S. gov­ern­ment would like to curb U.S. mem­ber­ship in such groups; indeed, the trend over the last decade has been for the U.S. gov­ern­ment to with­draw from them,” it said.

Separately, the USITC report said the IOC allo­cates 1,000 par­tic­i­pa­tion shares among its mem­bers based on their aver­age olive oil pro­duc­tion and exports in the past six years. The EU cur­rently holds 684 shares and because the U.S. is a small pro­ducer it would likely receive the min­i­mum 5 shares if it became an IOC mem­ber.

The U.S. does, how­ever, have IOC observer sta­tus, which allows it to fol­low the tech­ni­cal work in IOC com­mit­tees.

The IOC said in its state­ment that is a neu­tral, inter­gov­ern­men­tal insti­tu­tion which has always attended to the needs of all coun­tries, whether they are mem­ber or non-mem­ber, pro­duc­ing or con­sum­ing.”


Related Articles

Feedback / Suggestions