`
Deoleo, the Spanish food group that owns Italian olive oil brands Bertolli, Carapelli, and Sasso, responded to fraud alleÂgaÂtions by emphaÂsizÂing that their prodÂucts meet high qualÂity stanÂdards and comÂply with all food safety regÂuÂlaÂtions. Despite invesÂtiÂgaÂtions by Italian authorÂiÂties, Deoleo has requested a counÂtercheck to verÂify the results of senÂsory analyÂsis tests conÂducted on their olive oils.
After the clamor creÂated by the case of the famous brands of olive oil disÂtribÂuted in Italian superÂmarÂkets accused of fraud, Deoleo which manÂages the brands Bertolli, Carapelli and Sasso, promptly responded.
See Also:The World’s Best Olive Oils, Official NYIOOC RankingThe three brands, despite their Italian names, have been since 2008 the propÂerty of the Spanish food group, which in a press release, disÂmissed the alleÂgaÂtions, emphaÂsizÂing some points.
These conÂtrols, even if carÂried out by proÂfesÂsional tasters, are conÂsidÂered inapÂproÂpriÂate for many aspects.
Deoleo said its ​“prodÂucts and processes meet the highÂest qualÂity stanÂdards” and that the comÂpany ​“strictly respects all the laws and regÂuÂlaÂtions relatÂing to food secuÂrity in all the counÂtries in which it operÂates.”
Regarding the facts invesÂtiÂgated by the prosÂeÂcuÂtor in Turin, the comÂpany declared that the chemÂiÂcal and physÂiÂcal test conÂducted by the chemÂiÂcal labÂoÂraÂtory of the cusÂtoms agency in Genoa, had shown that their prodÂucts ​“are in accorÂdance with the Italian law about extra virÂgin olive oil and meet all the physÂiÂcal and chemÂiÂcal paraÂmeÂters (perÂoxÂide value, free fatty acids and specÂtrophoÂtoÂmetÂric analyÂsis of K232 and K270, total esters, ethyl esters).”
See Also:Italian Prosecutor Accuses Seven Brands of Fraud
Afterward, Deoleo affirmed that the incrimÂiÂnated prodÂucts, based on the date of packÂing, were comÂpletely comÂpliÂant both with physÂiÂcal and chemÂiÂcal analyÂsis and with tastÂing.
Considering that ​“the tastÂing carÂried out by the Italian police is a senÂsory analyÂsis, in which a group of experts appreÂciÂates just the smell and taste of olive oil,” the group conÂcluded that ​“the checks comÂmisÂsioned by the Prosecutor and carÂried out both by the magÂaÂzine The Test and subÂseÂquently by the NAS, are based excluÂsively on a tastÂing of the prodÂuct,” and in subÂstance, ​“these conÂtrols, even if carÂried out by proÂfesÂsional tasters, are conÂsidÂered inapÂproÂpriÂate for many aspects, as the method of analyÂsis subÂjecÂtive, non-repeatÂable and non-reproÂducible.”
Since the Italian law estabÂlishes a legal term of 30 days to request a rebutÂtal, Deoleo has already requested a counÂtercheck, to verÂify the results of the tastÂing made by NAS.
Today, the chief prosÂeÂcuÂtor, Armando Spataro, transÂferred the invesÂtiÂgaÂtion to the Prosecutors of Florence, Genoa, Spoleto and Velletri, the places of proÂducÂtion of olive oils under invesÂtiÂgaÂtion.