Report: Most Imported Extra Virgin Olive Oils Aren't Extra Virgin

Most olive oils labeled as extra virgin sourced from several California supermarkets were substandard, according to the UC Davis Olive Center.
Plaintiffs in both cases allege the distributors knew the oil wasn't ‘extra-virgin’ by the time it reached consumers.
Jul. 14, 2010 20:24 UTC
Denise Johnson

Recent News

In a report released today, 69 per­cent of imported olive oil sam­ples and 10 per­cent of California olive oil sam­ples labeled as extra vir­gin failed to meet the IOC/USDA stan­dards for extra vir­gin olive oil.

Teams from the Australian Oils Research Laboratory in Wagga Wagga, New South Wales and the University of California at Davis Olive Center ana­lyzed 14 imported brands and five California brands of extra vir­gin olive oils from three dif­fer­ent regions of California.
See Also:UC Davis Report
The two lab­o­ra­to­ries eval­u­ated the oils based on stan­dards and test­ing meth­ods estab­lished by the International Olive Council (IOC) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), as well as sev­eral newer stan­dards and test­ing meth­ods adopted in Germany and Australia.

The tests found that sam­ples of imported olive oil labeled as extra vir­gin” and sold at retail loca­tions in California usu­ally did not meet inter­na­tional and US stan­dards. Sensory tests showed that these failed sam­ples had defec­tive fla­vors such as ran­cid, fusty, and musty. Negative sen­sory results were con­firmed by chem­i­cal data in 86 per­cent of the cases.

The IOC and USDA chem­istry stan­dards often do not detect defec­tive olive oils that fail extra vir­gin sen­sory stan­dards. The report con­cluded IOC/USDA stan­dards would be more effec­tive in assess­ing and enforc­ing olive oil qual­ity by includ­ing another test referred to as the German/Australian DAGs stan­dards which were recently adopted in Germany and Australia to help detect the adul­ter­ation of extra vir­gin olive oils with refined olive oils. While the IOC/USDA chem­istry stan­dards con­firmed neg­a­tive sen­sory results in only 31 per­cent of cases, the German/Australian DAGs and PPP stan­dards sup­ported the neg­a­tive sen­sory find­ings in 86 per­cent of cases.

Of all imported olive oil brands tested only one, Kirkland Organic, was found to pass the sen­sory tests with all three regional sam­ples col­lected. As for the California brands just one, Bariani, exhib­ited sen­sory defects suf­fi­cient to fail extra vir­gin sen­sory stan­dards.

Just one sam­ple, from Safeway’s pri­vate label brand, had an acid­ity level above the .8% extra vir­gin thresh­old with a .84 read­ing, though other imported sam­ples came close to that. The FFA results for the California oils topped out with a .38 read­ing for Bariani. The low­est result of all olive oils tested was McEvoy Ranch Organic’s .16 level. Free fatty acid­ity is con­sid­ered a direct mea­sure of the qual­ity of the oil, the lower the num­ber, the bet­ter. Factors which lead to a high FFA in olive oil include fruit fly infes­ta­tion, delays between har­vest­ing and extrac­tion, fun­gal dis­eases in the fruit, and care­less extrac­tion meth­ods.

All sam­ples were within the IOC/USDA limit for per­ox­ide value (PV).

The chem­i­cal test­ing indi­cated that the sam­ples failed extra vir­gin stan­dards for rea­sons that include one or more of the fol­low­ing:

  • oxi­da­tion by expo­sure to ele­vated tem­per­a­tures, light, and/or aging;
  • adul­ter­ation with cheaper refined olive oil;
  • poor qual­ity oil made from dam­aged and over­ripe olives, pro­cess­ing flaws, and/or improper oil stor­age.

See Also:UC Davis Report


Related Articles