`Olive Oil Importers Say Trade Commission Report 'Fell Short' - Olive Oil Times

Olive Oil Importers Say Trade Commission Report 'Fell Short'

Dec. 15, 2013
Curtis Cord

Recent News


The North American Olive Oil Association (NAOOA) said the report on an inves­ti­ga­tion into the olive oil indus­try by the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) fell short of the objec­tive analy­sis that Congress requested,” and favored the nar­row per­spec­tive of the domes­tic indus­try.”

Favored the nar­row per­spec­tive of the domes­tic indus­try- Eryn Balch, NAOOA

In a copy of a let­ter to the USITC chair­man dated December 6 and obtained by Olive Oil Times, NAOOA exec­u­tive vice pres­i­dent Eryn A. Balch laid out the group’s response to the report released last September that some experts said would pro­vide ample grounds for trade actions and for­mal WTO com­plaints against E.U. olive oils imported into the U.S.

Report relies on unde­fined terms”

Balch com­plained that the report’s wide­spread reliance” on the terms low qual­ity” and high qual­ity” to describe olive oils that meet or exceed the International Olive Council extra vir­gin grade stan­dard led to the erro­neous impli­ca­tion” that some olive oils that make the grade are more wor­thy” than oth­ers that also meet the bench­marks.

Fails to ques­tion the integrity” of UC Davis Olive Center reports

The USITC report cited var­i­ous stud­ies by the University of California at Davis Olive Center as facts to sup­port its find­ings even though the Olive Center is, Balch wrote, a mar­ket­ing agent for California olive oil with a vested inter­est in pro­mot­ing domes­ti­cally.”

Advocates PPP and DAGs tests despite seri­ous flaws”

The importers’ group said the USITC report is too quick to embrace the chem­i­cal tests known as PPP and DAGs that domes­tic groups are push­ing as bet­ter meth­ods for deter­min­ing olive oil qual­ity. Balch said the tests were unre­li­able and favored olive vari­eties widely used in domes­tic pro­duc­tion.

Focuses on domes­tic mar­ket­ing order

The USITC repeat­edly con­sid­ered a mar­ket­ing order pro­posed by some domes­tic pro­duc­ers, but failed to acknowl­edge alter­na­tives, Balch wrote, such as a research and pro­mo­tion order” that the NAOOA has been call­ing for.

In September, the International Olive Council weighed in on the USITC report, say­ing it may not be suf­fi­ciently objec­tive, cor­rob­o­rated or con­sis­tent.”

The year-long USITC inves­ti­ga­tion, which cost an esti­mated $2 mil­lion, was requested by the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee chair­man, Dave Kamp, in October, 2012. The doc­u­ment exam­ines the com­plex global olive oil indus­try and the con­di­tions con­fronting American olive oil pro­duc­ers.


Related Articles

Feedback / Suggestions