Want to Restore Democracy? Grab a Fork

Research suggests a European diet precedes the advent of a middle class, and middle class means democracy.

Nov. 28, 2016
By Stav Dimitropoulos

Recent News

New research from the Laboratory for Comparative Social Research (LCSR) of the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Russia says that if human­ity wants to restore democ­racy, it had bet­ter shift the empha­sis on nutri­tion rather than income growth or lib­er­al­iza­tion of trade.

The work­ing paper titled A Recipe for the Democracy: The Spread of the European Diet and Political Change” tried to get to the bot­tom of the whole intrigu­ing ques­tion of how food and democ­racy relate.

Using a com­par­a­tive study with data from 157 coun­tries, the research found that a diet rich in dairy prod­ucts, olive oil, pro­tein, con­fec­tions and alco­hol — among oth­ers — bet­ter aligns with democ­racy.

The last thing a mal­nu­tri­tioned pop­u­la­tion has in mind is polit­i­cal activism.- Andrey Shcherbak, Researcher

No, it does not mean that con­sum­ing this kind of comestibles arbi­trar­ily makes peo­ple more demo­c­ra­tic. What the paper con­cluded pointed to was an indi­rect con­nec­tion between democ­racy and diet. Simply put, when peo­ple eat diverse, expen­sive and supe­rior food items instead of only bread and cere­als on a reg­u­lar basis, it is a strong sig­nal that democ­racy is well on its way.

The spread of a European diet’ — the diet with his­tor­i­cally unprece­dented high pro­por­tion of ani­mal pro­teins in its daily calo­rie intake — is con­sid­ered to be a proxy for the mid­dle-class expan­sion,” Andrey Shcherbak, senior research fel­low in the Laboratory for Comparative Social Research of the Higher School of Economics in St. Petersburg, Russia told Olive Oil Times.

Advertisement

A large mid­dle class is a struc­tural pre­req­ui­site for a tran­si­tion to democ­racy and suc­cess­ful con­sol­i­da­tion of it become more likely under a mid­dle class,” the researcher said.

But how could diet, a European type of diet in this case, pre­cede the advent of mid­dle class, and in turn, democ­racy? Shcherbak urged us to look back in his­tory, which evi­dences how the world’s top olive oil pro­duc­ers bore democ­racy.

Greece and Italy, two of the largest olive oil pro­duc­ers and con­sumers, are the birth­places of democ­racy and repub­lic. This is not a coin­ci­dence. Olive oil in Greece and Italy was an impor­tant source of fats and other valu­able nutri­ents for all peo­ple and a very com­mer­cially attrac­tive trade item. I believe these fac­tors con­tributed to the emer­gence of a large mid­dle class in ancient Greek and ancient Roman soci­eties,” says the Russian researcher, who goes so far as to say that maybe olive oil was one of the rea­sons why the polit­i­cal notions of democ­racy and repub­lic sprang from these areas.

But, despite the sym­bol­isms the wide­spread use of olive oil in the birth­places of Western-type democ­racy might dis­play, there are other rea­sons why nutri­tion might pre­cede democ­racy and not the other way round.

For a start, Shcherbak said that peo­ple who have per­ma­nent access to pres­ti­gious items like ani­mal and dairy prod­ucts are exis­ten­tially secure. They don’t need to ago­nize over daily sur­vival, and are free to embrace eman­ci­pa­tive val­ues. This makes it more likely for them to stand up for indi­vid­ual rights as com­pared to a soci­ety where peo­ple just scrape by.

Then, there is a social-polit­i­cal effect. Food auton­omy brings on polit­i­cal auton­omy. The last thing a mal­nu­tri­tioned pop­u­la­tion has in mind is polit­i­cal activism,” rea­soned Shcherbak. Poor and mal­nour­ished peo­ple can be eas­ily manip­u­lated. The rel­a­tive cost of their vote is very low for them. In some coun­tries, we observe large patron­age and clien­telist net­works that dis­trib­ute food for votes among the poor — mostly cheap, car­bo­hy­drate-rich items.”

Also, opti­mal nutri­tion equals good health. An enriched diet plays a cat­alytic role in the for­ma­tion of 29 vital organs includ­ing the cen­tral ner­vous sys­tem, which deter­mines cog­ni­tive capac­i­ties,” notes the study. Look at children’s edu­ca­tional per­for­mance,” Shcherbak stressed. Poverty and mal­nu­tri­tion sig­nif­i­cantly reduce it. Generally, health­ier pop­u­la­tions tend to be bet­ter edu­cated and more active in terms of polit­i­cal engage­ment.”

It is wor­thy to be men­tioned that LCSR’s study poses new con­cerns for the form of the needed assis­tance to devel­op­ing coun­tries. If good nutri­tion is key to estab­lish­ing democ­racy, then per­haps human­i­tar­ian aid may be prefer­able to finan­cial assis­tance for poorer coun­tries,” was a key find­ing of the October 2016 research.



Related News